The Mads Davidsen Column: China gain morale-boosting Japan result

EAFF East Asian Cup 2013

The CSL is taking a short summer break and instead it’s time for the national teams to take centre stage. This and next week, I will analyse EAFF games including the national teams from South Korea, Australia, Japan, and China.

South Korea inefficient
The first game was a disappointment – mostly because Australia did not come to play attacking football. A very defensive Aussie team played in a 4-5-1 (4-6-0 sometimes) system with an extremely low pressure line starting 10-15 meters on their half of the pitch, so their goal was clear – leave no space and room for the South Koreans.

The key to breaking down a deep-sitting team is to break them down with fast passes and few touches. Every time a player touches the ball 3-4 times, the defensive wins time to get back its balance and keep defending well. If the players only touch the ball 1-2 times instead, the opponent’s defensive organization will fall apart and their stamina will take a hit as well, giving the attacking team space to play in.

South Korea played too slowly for most of the match, to really threaten Australia, whose only main tactic was the counter-attack.

Furthermore you need long switching passes to find your top offensive players to get them one-on-one or one-on-two with opposition defenders. The Australians were trying to close down the space and leave no free room behind, but no team can cover an entire pitch, so if you can play 4-5 short passes in one area and then change the ball to the other side – there will be space around the pitch.

A player like Xabi Alonso from Real Madrid is one of the best players in the world for this. He can sense when to switch the game, and he can hit a perfect 40 meter pass with only 1-2 touches. These players help create more chances for the team by setting up talented attacking players.

Actually the best player for South Korea in this part of the game was number 4 – the central defender – Kim Young-Gwon from Guangzhou Evergrande. I have completed a scout report on him recently in my columns, but what a fantastic player. He could play in the top five leagues in Europe. He has a great defensive awareness and on the ball, he plays like a central midfielder with a percentage of between 90-92% of his passes finding a teammate. Far the best player on the pitch in Seoul during the match.

I also liked the South Korean left attacking side with 22 Yun Il-Lok as a fake winger moving inside the pitch to receive the ball in the space between the defence and midfield. A great young talented player, who will be interesting to follow in the coming games, and only 21 years old.

Of course South Korea got their chances from time to time, but their finishing were very poor and the team really lacks efficiency. The Aussie keeper Eugene Galekovic had a good game, but not many saves were spectacular and most would have been saved by any average keeper.

Great morale boosting result for China

The 1-5 defeat to Thailand is now in the past and instead China can be proud of the 3-3 result against Japan. Not because of the result only, but we saw players fighting for their country, never surrendering and working hard all the way to the end. And this attitude is promising for the future.

Professional coaches talk a lot about the ‘expression’ of your team. This means that no matter results, weather and other conditions, you want to see your team with the same expression all the time. And after analysing this condition we can see China had a very positive expression during the game.

If we look at some of the tactical changes from the new head coach – I liked the right side with number 22 Yu Dabao and number 17 Zhang Linpeng. A really strong right side, where 22 Dabao often would move inside the pitch leaving free space for 17 Zhang to run into. A very good tool for the Chinese offense in the future.

I would have liked to see the same model in the left side. Instead the new head coach decided to play with a right footed player as left full back – number 4 Rong Hao. I would instead have chosen 20 Wu Lei as the fake winger in the same role as Yu Dabao and then 3 Sun Xiang as the left full back, attacking the wide in the left side when Wu Lei would move inside the pitch.

The only positive side of playing with a right footed player in the left side is that the player can make a cross feint / stop dribbling on his way to the goal line and then cross with his right foot. And this is exactly what happened when China and Sun Ke scored the 3-3 goal, so in this situation Rong Hao did a very good full back job.

Japan played the game in a 4-3-3 system – very flexible – when they were in control of the ball, and we have to admit that technically the Japanese players are far ahead of the Chinese players. Years of structured youth training and top academies has helped create this advantage for the Japanese.

Japan can play to a higher tempo than China – this was responsible for some of the goals and chances for Japan during the game. China was trying to stand with a high back 4 chain, but often they were caught of shape by Japan, who won the ball and set up a counter attack with a deep, long pass behind the Chinese back 4. And there is nothing worse for a back 4 than running towards your own goal. This always means trouble.

An interesting aspect of the game was the Japanese equalizer. A corner kick headed once up in the air and then scored on the second touch (another header). When you look at the replay, the player who scores is totally unmarked. How can this happen?

The reason is China is using a 100% zonal marking system  on their defensive set pieces. This means that every player is covering a zone in the box and only attacks the ball if the ball comes into their zone. They ignore other opponents unless they enter their zone.

The issue regarding the 1-1 goal is a zone-classic. Because there was a header – almost all Chinese players were already away from their zones, but the ball was still in the box – leaving a Japanese player standing unmarked.

The problem with zone marking is in situations like this one – when the ball goes from set piece back to open play, then no one is marked and the zones are no longer covered like before the set piece kick. Details of course, but a big problem at the top level where good teams will punish situations like this.

China fought their way back into the game – maybe an easy given penalty by the referee on the 3-2 goal – but still China is looking like a team again and the players really worked hard to tie the game 3-3, grabbing an important point for the tournament as well.